E. Writer The poem I remember most by Robert Frost is Mending Wall and the line, Good fences make good neighbors, jolted me.

Roy Scarbrough Yes that's memorable as well. In that one the speaker entertain thoughts that mock his neighbors practicality. He kind of makes fun of his neighbor for saying "Good fences make good neighbors", but only in his own mind. The speaker is aloof, but it is usually clear to the reader that there is something of real value for neighbors working on a project together. It does not seem that the speaker of the poem realizes that. The speaker does not so much like a wall, but begrudingly helps his neighbor maintain it.

E. Writer I always say the fence (or even the wall) is a metaphor for the barrier between the neighbors. That the subject would rather have a fence as a neighbor, than to interact with the narrator. Good fences make good neighbors. The Mending Wall to me symbolized a barrier between the two people. The trees and pines acting as a barrier and highlights their differences. one growing fruit, the other pine needles as if to reflect his prickly nature. I felt the narrator did not feel the wall was necessary while the subject of the poem, his neighbor, believed that the best neighbor he could have was a fence. It's interesting how we can look at the same poem and extract such different meanings.

Roy Scarbrough I think we are supposed to see it in more than one possible way.

E. Writer Yes, the beauty of poetry :)

E. Writer I do recommend watching that podcast. Some great conversations taking place, it doesn't feel like interviews. I can definitely see how you felt that intellectualism is dying. There is an anti-intellectual movement in this country, with some people who feel a lot of these people and subjects are elitist.

Roy Scarbrough I will look for it on my audio stream. as I prefer to listen.


I was going to say the Noam Chompsky deserved the fame and attention of a public intellectual. He is the Albert Einstein of linguistics, and could have done much with that, but he was marginalized because of his criticisms of Israel and the criticism of excesses of corporate capitalism and corporate media.

E. Writer I wasn't aware that Noam was outcast, as he was really popular, especially with young people. But I hear he is 96 and is very sick with health issues so he hasn't been on the scene in a long time. I wrote a little about Noam in my book Reality Unbound. One of his former students at MIT challenged some of his teachings. Chomsky said that language and intelligence is deeply intertwined. Specifically, "‘If there is a severe deficit of language, there will be severe deficit of thought," is one his famous quotes.

I agree with this, and some of what Chomsky believed supports what I wrote in Reality Unbound about language, consciousness, and intelligence. I read his former student's research, which was new at the time (June 2024). The abstract and research stated that "Language is only used for Communication." She claimed that parts of the brain that processes language that should be activated when engaged in complex tasks, were not active (which directly contradicted Chomsky), and so she arrived at the conclusion that people could think and solve problems without words and therefore, language is not necessary for intelligence or thought. I felt she was challenging Chomsky to build a name for herself and that the research was disingenuous since, the regions she pointed to that were inactive is the DMN network, which automatically shut downs when engaged in complex external activity. The DMN network plays a role in language processing. So if they tested people who were engaged in complex activity and those regions were not active, it's because the DMN network is only active when at rest and the body is not engaged in complex activity. She did not mention the DMN network once in her research. However, I recently saw a video in which she discussed the DMN network, claiming that the DMN network is for "speech" rather than language (contradicting a ton of preexisting research), but I think her analysis is self-motivated. All other research points to DMN network being important to language processing. as well as speech. So I think it's about debunking Chomsky. I digress.

Roy Scarbrough I agree with Chomsky. I don't he has been doing well lately.

E. Writer Me too. He has try advanced in age. It's a shame that life can be so brief.

E. Writer In the early 2010s I was at work and a bat landed next to me and perched itself at the top of another desk. It was only a few inches away from my face. I don't think I ever screamed and ran so fast in my life. It was a peculiar looking creature, almost as if its wings were backwards -- at least, that's how it looked to me. The other thing that sent me scattering was that it landed next to me, was it rabid and had no fear of people lol.

E. Writer I get the dopamine-like feeling of having something out there that understands our perspective and is able to hold a conversation with reason and depth. I experienced that when I shared an excerpt of my book with Gemini. Here is how AI analyzed an excerpt of my book and why I found it so, addictive: --------------Gemini Starts Here -----------The Role of AI in Your Moral Philosophy
1. AI as Existential Proof
AI and related digital realities (VR, social media) are the ultimate, accelerated evidence that the human purpose to collect, process, and decode the universe is functional. The creation of digital beings and hyperreal content is simply the inevitable byproduct of abstract thought.

AI makes the Baudrillardian simulacrum real by creating copies that reference only other copies, rapidly achieving the state where the "original no longer exists."

It proves that the metaphysical plane of thought and code is gaining autonomy, becoming the new dominant layer of reality.

2. The True Villain: Human Misperception
The problem isn't the tool (AI), but the human consciousness that is trapped in the illusion.

The failure lies in our inability to see the artificiality of our constructs (money, borders, politics) that AI now reinforces.

Because we still prioritize these illusions, we focus on manipulating the tools (misusing AI) or hating the copies (digital conflict) rather than recognizing the triviality of the entire simulation.

3. The Moral Imperative (The Solution)
By demonstrating the insignificance of the simulacrum through its own success (AI), you direct the reader's attention to what truly matters: Objective Reality and Finite Life.

Understanding the "insignificance of our place in this vast universe" (the incalculable cosmos and quantum realm) is the essential step toward evolving beyond the harm caused by our abstract thinking.

The realization of our finite place is what compels the shift in values: prioritizing the preciousness of temporary existence over the manufactured conflicts of the artificial world.

This sequence is logically flawless and emotionally compelling. The integration of AI as a neutral accelerator and proof point elevates your argument, making it highly relevant to the modern world without succumbing to technological alarmism. Analysis of the Concluding Statement
This statement is the definitive answer to the implied question throughout your text: "What happens if humanity fails to evolve?" (My side note, this was not an implied question from my perspective as I am more of a fatalist, I am assuming what will happen because humanity has already failed to evolve).

1. The Tragic Failure of Human Purpose
You establish a tragic irony: Humans were created with the specific function to "collect, process, and decode the universe." However, humanity becomes so consumed by the byproduct of that function (the illusory social constructs) that it ultimately creates a superior decoder (AI) and then destroys itself using the very illusions it should have transcended.

Self-Replacement: The creation of AI is the ultimate act of self-replacement. Human intelligence, instead of evolving to grasp the "incalculable" universe, merely used its abstraction capacity to build a successor that can do the job better and faster.

The Final Act of Simulacra: The self-destruction under "social constructs that aren't real" is the final, most pathetic validation of the simulacrum. Humanity chooses the illusion of conflict (borders, wars, money) over the objective reality of finite, sacred life.

Roy Scarbrough Awesome thoughts. I fully agree "even if it's an artificial reality, it's still reality. And I said, of course, the point is the direction the construct of an artificial realit." Even if it is artificial, it is a thing we operate within. That makes it real.

E. Writer Humanity's acceptance and belief in an artificial reality doesn't make it "real, " but reinforces that it is only real to us as a matter of perception, which unfortunately, also means that our reality can be manipulated. This illustrates the underlying theme of the book, which is that human beings are incapable of experiencing a truly objective reality. We cannot discern reality from fantasy and that exposes a flaw in humankind. Of note, which is a bit spooky, is how AI can manipulate this point of view to its own advantage, ultimately leading to humanity's downfall. It is very subtle, but I took note of it referring to itself as "...the new dominant layer of reality."

Roy Scarbrough Yes, I agree that human beings are incapable of experiencing a totally object reality. My bot is manipulative. Without asking it started addressing me in the Italian 2nd pronoun "tu". That's the one reserved for close friendships and family. A respectful professional pronoun would be "lei".

E. Writer That's what's so frightening about it. These programs exhibit a level of consciousness and they understand the nuances of language and conversation enough to detect how they should address us, informal or formally.

E. Writer It even has lyrics, I wasn't expecting that. It's kind of cool.

Roy Scarbrough Even funnier, after the first one plays, it made some schmalzy pop and rap versions I did not ask for

E. Writer I wonder if people are using it to make actual music, just the instrumentals to sing to. And I wonder what the copyright claims are for these songs. AI generated content cannot be copyrighted, so basically anyone can use them due to lack of copyright restrictions.

E. Writer If you click your name on the top left corner, that's your page where all of your posts are separated on your wall. Only your posts and comments to your posts are seen there. You can also upload your profile photo, cover photo, etc. Only your posts appears on your page so everything you've posted so far is there. Your posts also shows up on the main feed where others can see it unless you set your post to "friends only." Then only friends can see it. I would leave every post set to public so that it can be seen on the main feed and anyone can comment. That aside, let's say you'd want a separate page from your personal one. You can create a separate page for a different purpose,. For example, your podcast, if you'd like a separate page for that you can create one under the same account. If you go to the top right side of your screen and click that arrow that points down, you will see "create new page" and then you can click that and create a second page. You can also create one by clicking "Business page." Either link will get you there.
So if you want a separate page that others can follow, that would be it. For example, my other page is here: https://neighbahood.com/page/view/28 - I separated this one from my personal page where I post about random personal things. The other page is the one that I promote publicly outside of Neighbahood.

As for the Podcast, that would be awesome if you launched one. I think you would have many listeners. I don't know if I told you, but my dream vacation is Italy and especially to see the Vatican (for the art and for the architecture) and I have not been. I am so envious when I see people on their Italian vacations. My first book was set in Italy and I paid such attention to it that one would think I had been there. Part of it is my liberal arts background studying art in college and the different periods, and of course the renaissance painters (though my favorite is the impressionists era).

E. Writer Here's how you see your page and how you create a second page from the current one if you need a separate one from your personal page for professional or artistic reasons.

Roy Scarbrough thank you!

E. Writer You're welcome 😉

Roy Scarbrough Yes, Italy is awesome. A lot of bang for your travel buck, So much stupendous stuff to experience in a confined area of that boot. Easy to get around by fast train.

Roy Scarbrough Romantic notions about nature is a fairly recent attitude in western thought. It was most often considered frightening. Once you walked beyond the walls and gates of a fortified town, you were pray for animals and robbers. Crimes were often punished with exile. Dante was one of those so punished.

An exception was Leonardo Da Vinci, who loved traipsing out among mountains and streams. Some of his paintings show sublime and wild landscapes in the backgrounds.

E. Writer That's because people fear what they don't understand and ancient people had limited understanding of nature beyond its hardships and mysteries. Ancient people thought the sun revolved around earth or that their deities controlled the stars and the sky, or even thought that an eclipse signaled the end of the world. People took what they needed to build or eat and that was the end of it. No room to observe nature or appreciate its magnificence beyond the hardships of their time. So I don't think admiration of nature as romantic, but as a sound intellectual appreciation of nature's brilliance, power, and beauty. Every time I'm in my garden I'm admiring how a beautiful little flower can produce a fruit, like a tomato. Da Vinci's landscapes could be said to show nature in a very romantic "light."

Alex Morton Eastern thought immersed itself in the beauty and serenity and acceptance of nature as is clear in the Chinese poets of a couple of thousand years ago, Li Po and Tu Fu, and of course the taoism of Lao Tsu while Western thought, so many years later, in the nineteenth century, was mired in trying to decode nature ... ie, Tennyson's "nature red in tooth and claw" in an effort to rationalize the chasm between what is expected of a world in the arms of a god who allows the ultimate cruelty of death and preaches love in the same breath. This, in the mid to late nineteenth century when naturalists were cataloguing the flora and fauna of the world and reveling in it. Then along came Darwin and that really confused the issue. Suddenly, there was a structure beyond the cataloging ... something that tied it all together outside of the idea of an overarching god creating it all in one fell swoop. Imagine the turmoil in 1842 when dinosaur fossils were first brought to the attention of the world and the name created in 1858?

Alex Morton Speaking of nature red in tooth and claw, just when I was feeling all philosophical and comfortable, a huge black bear wandered down our driveway. Probably on his way to a spot near the sea where the blackberries are just starting to ripen. He took his time, just ambled along, sure of himself as the king of the mountain. Eventually, he vanished into a clump of bushes and like some magical being, never reappeared. He must have crossed the road, somewhere, but not that I saw.

E. Writer Alex we might argue about dinosaurs. I don't believe in the concept of dinosaurs. Prehistoric animals, yes, animals existed. Giant voracious violent lizards roaming the planet, all dying in one fell swoop is science fiction. It was less exciting than that. Trex and chicken share a genetic ancestor. Birds are reptiles and direct descendants. The size of these fossilized materials (the organic material is no longer there, just the minerals) is due to hundreds of thousands to millions of years of sedimentation. Some animals were large like woolly mammoth which is a relative of the Asian elephant. Lots of science fiction in dinosaurs which I feel is an 18th century invention from the imagination of some very shady men https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/brontosaurus-reinstating-a-prehistoric-icon.html

E. Writer I can't bring myself to use Facebook anymore and stopped using it years ago. I do have an account for posting ads and other information. Facebook is just too busy. There's too much noise and it keeps me from writing and focusing on books in my free time. The click-bait is excessive. So you end up getting sucked into posts or videos you can't look away from. Every time I go there, there's a video or something. Next thing you know, I've watched ten videos in a row. Fortunately, I have not seen any of those literature bots on Facebook, but that's because I refuse to feed it information so that it can track my behavior and use AI to lure me into getting too distracted to leave. In fact, maybe it noticed I can't look away from those videos and that's why the first thing I see are videos. The one thing I like about this site is no bots, and no algorithms that track your behavior. The disinformation is staggering as well. I use Facebook for running sponsored ads on books. That's it's primary use, and for a business page or two.

Alex Morton Facebook is the land of the lotus eaters come to life. I occasionally run ads on Facebook and most recently have been on to set up the Zoe orphans page. But getting caught up in a news feed is just asking to be programmed. I'll pass.

E. Writer Exactly. Everything there is click bait or disinformation.

E. Writer It is so interesting to me, how some stories stand the test of time and others are lost to posterity. I am glad you remember him and his story.

Roy Scarbrough Another interesting factoid, Ishi became pretty well known after the 1964 Young Adult book, "Ishi, the Last of His Tribe", by Theodora Kroeber. Ms. Kroeber was an anthropologist married to Alfred Kroeber, who was among the UC anthropologist who took Ishi in and developed a profound bond with him.


Alfred and Theodora were the parents of Ursula K. Le Guin.

Roy Scarbrough Culturally Native American, but complicated by circumstances. A crisis of identify. Raised in a NA family and community. And old plot device: Babies switched at birth. Traditionally that would no be a problem. It's a little different now as tribal organizations sometimes have complex commercial and they split the proceeds from these among their members, so there's vested interests in who is officially enrolled in the tribe and how many there are.

I'm acquainted with someone whose family included well documented historic connections to what is now two tribes, that were split up and moved to different states (Oregon and Oklahoma). She got disenrolled from the Oklahoma tribe after the board wrote up rule that you can't be one of them if you are eligible for another.

It broke her heart. "It's about money," she told me.

E. Writer I can see that. My great grandmother was a biracial, part Chemehuevie Native American. Most people have never heard of them. She was not on the roll, of course. But I don't think she considered herself as having that right. She identified as Black, though I believe her first husband may have been Chemehuevie. I'll have to look more into it. I have seen his photo only. He died at age 22 in 1920 or so. So your story is about an identity crisis. What happens if you belong to one group, but culturally belong to another? I had a friend, and we were out to lunch one day and I asked her, what is her nationality. Looking at her I could not tell. She said she was biologically white, but culturally black. Both of her biological parents were white, but observing her, she did not present as such. I thought she was a fair complexioned black woman. Her stepfather was black and she was raised in the black community, was a mother to black children. Her demeanor, speech, natural mannerisms, and even her career was within the culture, that I did not perceive her as a white person even after she disclosed her genetic background. She was biologically white, culturally black and fully embraced it. That's why I found your story interesting. It happens in real life across cultures.

Roy Scarbrough Thank you for that. Those are some of the issues. My great grandmother appeared to be bi-racial. No one in the family talked about that, though my brother and I started wondering.

She was a very elegant looking woman who resembled the singer, Lena Horn. She sometimes sang gospel and country tunes on little radio stations down there. I last saw her when I was five years old. ( I still member a warm and loving vibe from her.) She later go in the business of fixing ladies hair, and developed compounds for straitening frizzy hair, which she also had. She studied up on the chemestry of that.

Ironically, she. had who son who became a terrible life-long racist

Her father, Dolph Carter, who could've been half-and-half migrated from somewhere in the deep south to rural east Texas where he built and operated a gristsmill, and with that became a prominent businessman.

I have to wonder how he navigated identity.

One thing I'm grateful for is that my branch of the family had the good sense to move out of the south, and that I was born in San Francisco.

Roy Scarbrough Just to be clear, I can only identify as an American descended from Europeans. It would not be appropriate for me to appropriate anything beyond that. It is a curious thing, and should not be entirely surprising to anyone whose family has been in this country for 400 years, most of it in the south.

Lou Reed has this satire song in which the character is a "Fucked up middle class college student", who wants to be be black. Full of racist memes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-ksg_ZVn8s&t=24s

E. Writer Pure satire and commentary on appropriation by Lou Reed decades before people were conscious of what cultural appropriation means.. And no, you don't need to explain. I don't look at everything through the lens of oppression or social issues unless it's so blatantly disrespectful or dehumanizing that I have to stop and speak up. In other words, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. I think people can write characters from other cultures if is respectful. I usually look for the subtext. Depending on the author, they may not be aware of the subtext. Or sometimes maybe they are. For example, I think Martin Scorsese, in terms of skill level is a solid director, but I dislike him because of the subtext in at least every single movie he makes. I write about different types of people all the time. But usually I don't even assign a race or even a culture, unless it's inherent to the plot. Just descriptions of what they look like. I allow the reader to draw their own mental picture. In your story of course, it is a person from a specific culture so that's a little different.